[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort
From: |
Brian Dessent |
Subject: |
Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:57:20 -0800 |
The Wanderer wrote:
> Instead, I'll just ask how
> exactly I'm supposed to make sure that one and *only* one copy of any
> messages I receive from the list gets sorted into the folder in which I
> keep list messages... while simultaneously making sure that any messages
> which happen to have been replies to list messages but which are not
> sent through the list do *not* wind up in that folder?
Filter on the List-Id: header present in every list message. Regardless
of reply-to issues I find this to be much more reliable than trying to
match addresses in all the various To/CC/BCC/whatever fields.
Brian
- Apparently irrational behaviour in sort, The Wanderer, 2005/12/04
- Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort, Andreas Schwab, 2005/12/04
- Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort, The Wanderer, 2005/12/04
- Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort, Eric Blake, 2005/12/05
- Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort, The Wanderer, 2005/12/05
- Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort, Brian Dessent, 2005/12/05
- Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort, The Wanderer, 2005/12/05
- Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort,
Brian Dessent <=
- mailing list procmail rules (Re: Apparently irrational behaviour in sort), Bob Proulx, 2005/12/07