[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:25:40 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1

On 11/11/2011 10:36 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Are you proposing that --block-size keep the current behavior, and that
> -k no longer be a synonym for --block-size=1k but instead becomes a new
> long option?
> Makes sense to me

That sort of thing makes sense to me too.
I assume --block-size should silently override -k
if both options are specified (in either order)?
Does -k need a long-named option?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]