[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9939: bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
bug#9939: bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:46:45 +0100 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 11/11/11 13:10, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Do you feel like writing the patch?
>
> Sure. I wrote and pushed the following.
> The test case isn't elegant, but at least it catches the bug.
That was quick. Thanks!
- bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong, (continued)
- bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong, Eric Blake, 2011/11/11
- bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/11
- bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/11
- bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong, Eric Blake, 2011/11/11
- bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/11
- bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/11
- bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong, Paul Eggert, 2011/11/12
- bug#9939: bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong,
Jim Meyering <=
- bug#10016: ls -lk is wrong, Pádraig Brady, 2011/11/11