[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g
|
From: |
Andreas Jaeger |
|
Subject: |
bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g |
|
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jul 2012 10:11:25 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/4.8.4 (Linux/3.4.4-1-desktop; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
df -k and df -m both work but only df -k is mentioned as part of df --
help. So, the omission to document -m is IMO a bug.
A second issue:
Since df supports -k and -m, shouldn't if support -g (as synoym for --
block-size=1M as well?
Btw. df --version outputs:
df (GNU coreutils) 8.16
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger address@hidden,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g,
Andreas Jaeger <=
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/04
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Eric Blake, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Jim Meyering, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Jim Meyering, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/07/11
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Jim Meyering, 2012/07/11