[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
Subject: |
bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jul 2012 16:43:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 |
On 07/05/2012 02:35 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> However, I'm tempted to remove it directly this time, since it's been
> undocumented for a while:
>
> 5 years in df.1 and df --help: COREUTILS-6_9-151-g1e07a21
> 11 years in coreutils.texi: FILEUTILS-4_1_4-28-gf5bf6fe
>
> What do you think?
I agree, the option has been added to df in 1996, and declared
obsolescent in 2001, so the period since the latter is twice as
long as the active use.
And it's very easy to s/--megabytes/-BM/ ...
Have a nice day,
Berny
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Andreas Jaeger, 2012/07/04
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/04
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Eric Blake, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Jim Meyering, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g,
Bernhard Voelker <=
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Jim Meyering, 2012/07/05
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Bernhard Voelker, 2012/07/11
- bug#11858: df -m undocumented, why no df -g, Jim Meyering, 2012/07/11