[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12365: Should cp -n return 0, when DEST exists?
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
Subject: |
bug#12365: Should cp -n return 0, when DEST exists? |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:21:25 +0200 (CEST) |
On September 6, 2012 at 4:31 PM Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> $ echo one > bar
> $ echo two > blah
> $ cp -n blah bar
> $ echo $?
> 0
> $ cat bar
> one
>
> that FreeBSD also returns 0 in this case, and I don't want to break
> interoperability. Therefore, I'm going to close this as a WONTFIX,
> unless you also get buy-in from the BSD folks.
Actually -n is implemented as if the user had answered 'n'
when he used the -i option - sure enough without prompting
the user.
$ echo n | cp -vi blah bar
cp: overwrite `bar'?
$ echo $?
0
BTW: it's similar with the mv command.
The texi page is a bit sparse about the exit value:
@exitstatus
Maybe it's worth adding a line about the exist status
when using -n or -i (together with answering 'n')?
Have a nice day,
Berny