[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24926: ls output has been made ugly
From: |
Michael Schwager |
Subject: |
bug#24926: ls output has been made ugly |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 16:27:11 -0600 |
Can anyone point me to the mailing list discussion where this originally
was decided?
There are legion of coreutils users out there who are dumbfounded and who
detest this change; I see that Debian has reverted it. However, I (and
Debian) could be wrong. I'd like to see the original discussion which will
hopefully point to the well-founded reasoning for its implementation (eg,
POSIX requires it, a tremendous clamour from the user community, what have
you).
I have searched in the mailing list but not found the original point of the
decision; I don't have the proper expression foo to return it...
--
-Mike Schwager
bug#24926: ls output has been made ugly, L. A. Walsh, 2016/11/11
- bug#24926: ls output has been made ugly, Eric Blake, 2016/11/11
- bug#24926: ls output has been made ugly, L. A. Walsh, 2016/11/11
- bug#24926: ls output has been made ugly, Eric Blake, 2016/11/11
- bug#24926: ls output has been made ugly, L. A. Walsh, 2016/11/11
- bug#24926: ls output has been made ugly, L. A. Walsh, 2016/11/11
- bug#24926: ls output has been made ugly, Reuti, 2016/11/11