[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32
From: |
Joerg Schilling |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32 |
Date: |
Sun, 22 May 2011 15:22:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
nail 11.22 3/20/05 |
James Youngman <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I am sure that you know that the existence of --something in many GNU tools
> > did
> > already result in many non-portable scripts and there is no man page that
> > warns
> > of using --something.
>
> CSSC doesn't do that though.
SCCS and similar tools are usually used by more experienced people who are
expecte to have more knowledge on portability than a typical user of "gls".
> > If you don't include code in CSSC that automatically switches to binary
> > (encoded) mode, why did you write this test?
>
> I do include such code.
Then I don't understand the purpose of you test as it seems to verify that
there is no such automatic switch to binary mode.
> > The last sentence is in conflict with historic SCCS behavior, but Sun
> > chnaged
> > their copy to match POSIX. POSIX does not mention that -n if exquivalent,
> > but
> > if we agree that the last sentence from POSIX -i should be interpreted to:
> > "The options -n -and -i are equivalent except for the parameter to -i", then
> > I would need to permit "admin -b -r s.foo" with SCCS.
> >
> > You however would then also need to permit "admin -r2 -n s.foo" with CSSC
> > for
> > orthogonality.
>
> I just updated the test suite to remove the test for this case, but I
> haven't yet made the code change to actually permit this combination.
> Swap it for admin -b -n :)
Well, do you agree that -n and -i should be interpreted as equivalent and that
you should accept "admin -r2 -n s.foo"?
> > Do you have contact to the related people?
>
> I'm afraid not. Indeed you indicated you think that no development
> has taken place on the Unix vendors' SCCS implementations since y2k.
> I can believe it, and if that's true, there will be no such people,
> either. I mailed a friend of mine who would be likely to know but
> don't expect a reply on that until the working week has begun.
Well, I offered my extensions to Sun a few years ago but apart from a note that
showed interest, nothing happened. This is why I started to believe that the
vendors might not have interest.
BTW: You may like to read the updated man pages, e.g.
http://sccs.berlios.de/man/sccs-admin.1.html
http://sccs.berlios.de/man/sccsfile.4.html
with more information on flag usage.
Jörg
--
EMail:address@hidden (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
address@hidden (uni)
address@hidden (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
- [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, Joerg Schilling, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, Joerg Schilling, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, James Youngman, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, Joerg Schilling, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, James Youngman, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, Joerg Schilling, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, James Youngman, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32,
Joerg Schilling <=
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, James Youngman, 2011/05/22
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, James Youngman, 2011/05/22
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, Joerg Schilling, 2011/05/22
- Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32, Joerg Schilling, 2011/05/22