Re: [Bug-cssc] Test binary/auto.sh fa11

[Joerg Schilling]

James Youngman <address@hidden> wrote:

> > I do not see a nice way to mention that SCCS is not something I have written
> > but that I seem to be the current maintainer.
>
> I just suggested one way.   Or use whatever name you choose.  But just
> saying SCCS is simply too ambiguous.

Well, how abut SCCS-5.0 for what has been written by AT&T + Sun, SCCS-5.1 for 
the current development release and SCCS-6.0 for the planned enhanced version?

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:address@hidden (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       address@hidden                (uni)  
       address@hidden (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily