Re: [Bug-cssc] Test binary/auto.sh fa11

[James Youngman]

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Joerg Schilling
<address@hidden> wrote:
> James Youngman <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> > I do not see a nice way to mention that SCCS is not something I have 
>> > written
>> > but that I seem to be the current maintainer.
>>
>> I just suggested one way.   Or use whatever name you choose.  But just
>> saying SCCS is simply too ambiguous.
>
> Well, how abut SCCS-5.0 for what has been written by AT&T + Sun, SCCS-5.1 for
> the current development release and SCCS-6.0 for the planned enhanced version?

5.0 looks like a version number to me, to be honest.

James.