bug-ddrescue
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-ddrescue] Suggestions to rename "logfile"


From: Martin Bittermann
Subject: Re: [Bug-ddrescue] Suggestions to rename "logfile"
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 03:27:54 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0

Hello Antonio,

maybe 'blockfile', 'statusfile' or 'progressfile'.
Problem with the latter two is they don't make sense for the domain logfile (it does not contain a status or progress). Calling them 'progressfile' and 'domainfile' could make sense, but does not convey the fact that they use the same format and can change roles on subsequent runs.

I'd rather keep the current name ;-)
Of course there is the pitfall for new users who think "I don't need a logfile, won't read it anyway..." but the documentation makes it pretty clear it is a bad idea to run ddrescue without logfile.


Best regards,
Martin

Am 14.06.2015 um 01:03 schrieb Antonio Diaz Diaz:
Dear all,

Some people think that the "logfile"[1] of ddrescue should be renamed. That "logfile" means just a log of the program's activity, which is not true of ddrescue's logfile.

I tend to agree that the name is somewhat misleading, but I have been unable to find a suitable replacement name yet.

So I'm asking your suggestions about an appropriate name. Maybe among all we well be able to find a better name.

[1]http://www.gnu.org/software/ddrescue/manual/ddrescue_manual.html#Logfile-structure


Thanks in advance,
Antonio.

_______________________________________________
Bug-ddrescue mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]