[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] corruption in 4.2
From: |
Andrew J. Schorr |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] corruption in 4.2 |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:04:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:58:18PM -0500, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> There's good news and bad news. I think the attached patch fixes the
> assertion failure. But I don't think it fixes the corruption that Eric
> found.
>
> Eric -- can you please test?
No, this doesn't fix it. But it is a needed patch. Back to the
drawing board.
-Andy
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, arnold, 2017/11/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/17
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej], 2017/11/23
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, arnold, 2017/11/23
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Arnold Robbins, 2017/11/24
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/24
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, arnold, 2017/11/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/25
- Re: [bug-gawk] corruption in 4.2,
Andrew J. Schorr <=