[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Info-clone-buffer-hook should be renamed
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Info-clone-buffer-hook should be renamed |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:03:16 -0800 |
> > It's OK if the function name says to do something with a hook
> > (e.g. `add-hook', `mmm-run-major-mode-hook'), but I don't see it
> > as appropriate for many of those you cited. Just one opinion, of
> > course.
>
> My point is that using -hook for functions, and specifically for
> functions intended to be added to a hook, is a long-standing
> convention.
We agree that there are a lot of them and those names are not new. That doesn't
make it a convention. And it doesn't make it good. Anyway, as I say: just one
opinion.