bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No coding system used for environment variables


From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
Subject: Re: No coding system used for environment variables
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:16:45 +0900
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shij┼Ź) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

>>>>> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:57:31 +0000, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> said:

> YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote:
>> 2008-03-05 Jason Rumney <address@hidden> * fileio.c
>> (Fexpand_file_name): Decode home directory names.
>> (Fsubstitute_in_file_name): Decode substituted variables.
>> 
>> But I'd strongly suggest to revert this changes at this timing of
>> pretest for upcoming Emacs 22.2.

> It fixes a serious bug. Users with non-ASCII names in their user
> names get strange behaviour of filename expansion.

I know, but your patch has a serious problem and leads to regression.

>> First, some coding systems are not ready until some .elc files get
>> loaded (a chicken-and-egg problem).
>> 

> It should not present a chicken and egg problem, as no files are
> loaded during bootstrap that require expansion of ~ or environment
> variables.

I meant the startup of the dumped executable.  Users may set
EMACS_LOAD_PATH and so on.

>> Second, as DECODE_FILE causes GC and string compaction in general,
>> some variables such as `nm' in Fexpand_file_name may not point to
>> valid data after that.

> This is a problem on some systems that still do not support stack
> marking for GC protection of such variables. But I think this bug is
> important enough to fix those problems rather than revert the patch.

Relocation of string data caused by GC has nothing to do with
(semi-obsolete) GCPROs.  Believe me, it causes a real problem.

>> You may also want to see a related patch in
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2007-05/msg00115.html
>> 

> Was there a problem with that patch? Why was it not installed at the time?

Because no expert in this area made a response about the patch.

                                     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
                                address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]