[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient
From: |
Eli Barzilay |
Subject: |
bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:18:59 -0400 |
On Aug 17, Juri Linkov wrote:
> > A prefix of
> > 1 (or just C-u) -> output a plain number into the buffer
> > 2 -> number + alternative radix outputs into the buffer
> > 3 -> number + alternates + character into the buffer
> > -1, -2, -3 -> same as above, but for the echo area
> > And the above always behaves the same.
> >
> > *No* prefix means:
> > show the plain number output in the echo area on first use
> > number + alternates on second use (with no prefix, of course)
> > number + alternates + character on the third use.
>
> Then maybe the same scheme should be applied to `eval-expression'
> (`M-:') as well.
Yes, that sounds good to me.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Eli Barzilay, 2009/08/11
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/12
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Eli Barzilay, 2009/08/12
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/13
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Eli Barzilay, 2009/08/13
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/14
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Eli Barzilay, 2009/08/14
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/15
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Eli Barzilay, 2009/08/15
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/16
- bug#4118: 23.1; eval-last-sexp-print-value is inconvenient,
Eli Barzilay <=