bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#15797: 24.3.50; Info: Mention cache-long-scans


From: Michael Heerdegen
Subject: bug#15797: 24.3.50; Info: Mention cache-long-scans
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:50:03 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> > From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>,
> > address@hidden, address@hidden
> > Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:02:11 +0100
> > 
> > BTW, when cache-long-scans t works now, is there any benefit in setting
> > it nil?
>
> We will shortly turn it on by default, as you see from the rest of
> this discussion.

Sorry, you misunderstood.  What I meant was: do we (perspectively) need
a variable at all, when a nil value only has downsides?  Why should
anybody want to configure this variable to nil (the default value is t
now) when it has only disadvantages?  That's what I meant.

Michael.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]