[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#20521: Bug 2051

From: Nick Andryshak
Subject: bug#20521: Bug 2051
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 17:08:22 -0400

> How on Earth? Perhaps setq is broken.

That's really not something you should say lightly! 

> Perhaps we aren't actually *in* a buffer when setq is called (is that
> possible?) and thus the global value is being set. I don't understand
> how this is possible and, now that I've uncovered this, I'm not sure
> what I can do to fix it.

I think you may misunderstand: setq always sets a global variable.
Perhaps you want to use setq-local?



- Nick

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]