bug#38294: [PATCH] Handle killing of virtual buffers in Ido

[Stefan Kangas]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Yeah, I think you're right, and the original patch was the correct
> solution here: When the user explicitly (and interactively) kills a
> buffer, then they expect that buffer to go away.  (There isn't any other
> reasonable interpretation for that interactive action.)
>
> It's perhaps slightly inconsistent, but I think it's more DWIM.

Thanks!