[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks |
|
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jan 2023 15:20:14 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie>, larsi@gnus.org,
> 49160@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:25:40 -0500
>
> >> > So I'm not sure we want this. What is the real-life use case behind
> >> > this request?
> >>
> >> The real-life use case is satisfying this bug report+patch from me,
> >> fixing what seems like a simple oversight, and the ensuing peace of mind
> >> that I will be grateful for, of course ;).
> >
> > Stefan, WDYT?
>
> It makes the code simpler and fixes a bug, I'm all for it.
> I don't think it's urgent, so it's not super important whether it goes
> into `emacs-29`, OTOH.
Installing it means the buffer-list-update-hook will not run when we
generate an indirect buffer with this option. Is that reasonable?
If you-two aren't averted by this effect, then let's install this on
the emacs-29 branch.