[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build bug in Binutils 2.11?
From: |
tt |
Subject: |
Re: Build bug in Binutils 2.11? |
Date: |
26 Jun 2001 14:47:17 +0300 |
address@hidden (Hans-Bernhard Broeker) writes:
> Karl Bolingbroke <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I've run across what may be a bug in the configure/build
> > phase of Binutils 2.11 on HP-UX 11.00 with GCC 3.0.
>
> > The file "include/libiberty.h" uses the type 'size_t'. This
> > type is supposed to be derived from the file <stddef.h>, but
> > <stddef.h> doesn't seem to be defining it.
>
> That would be major bug in HP's <stddef.h>, then. ANSI C requires
> <stddef.h> to define size_t. The bug would indeed be so gross that I
> have my doubts this can really be the case --- not even HP can be that
> ignorant of a standard that has been in use for over 12 years, now.
In our HPs stddef.h does define size_t (via #include sys/_size_t.h)
in HP-UX 11.00 as well as HP-UX 11.11. What's more, binutils 2.11
builds without any tricks straight out of the box using HP's on ANSI C
compiler (except for ld, which configure declares unsupported).
I would look for problems in gcc installation.
--
Tapani Tarvainen