[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] documentation: checker vs. chequer

From: Joern Thyssen
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] documentation: checker vs. chequer
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:45:55 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:27:52AM -0300, Albert Silver wrote
> I guess that leaves me as an isolated American.... I don't prefer
> choices such as cheQUer because they are 'unique', as it opens a whole
> ugly can of worms. 

"chequer" may be very special, but what about "analyse" vs "analyze" and
"colour" vs "color"?

> If one wants unique, why not kube, dubble, etc.? 

I don't think it's a desire to be unique. 

> No
> matter, I know I'm outvoted here; just giving my opinion.

Well, I guess that those who contribute to the documentation decides,
and I reckon we'll have to live with some inconsistencies from one
chapter to another. I don't think we should enforce that the British
contributors write "analyze" or vice versa that American contributors
should write "analyse".


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]