[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Win32 builds - new set of DLL
From: |
Øystein Johansen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Win32 builds - new set of DLL |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:59:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
Øystein O Johansen wrote:
I think iconv.dll and libiconv-2.dll is compatible to each other. Let's use
just one.
Same with libintl. I think we should just use one, not both libint-1.dll
and libintl-2.dll. Let's agree to use the same dll's for all builds, and
let's also try not to use two different library versions in the same
distribution, if possible. I think we should put a high priority on that.
(Maybe even make a special build of a library)
Hi, all!
I have now updated all the libraries and compilers for my gnubg builds.
This is what I currently use, and I think we should all use the same
libraries.
The compiler is now gcc-3.2.3 (mingw special 20030504-1)
http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml
GTK+, GDK and Glib is all take from Tor's site.
http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32/downloads.html
Since GTK and glib from Tor's site depends on iconv.dll and
libintl-1.dll, I think we all should make builds that depend only on
these two dlls. DON'T TAKE libiconv OR libintl OR gettext LIBRARIES FROM
ANY OTHER SITE!
That's libiconv-1.9-w32.2.bin.woe32.zip
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/gettext/libiconv-1.9-w32.2.bin.woe32.zip?download>
at http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=25167
and http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32/libintl-0.10.40-tml-20020904.zip
and http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32/gettext-dev-0.10.40-20020904.zip
The following libraries is taken from GnuWin32,
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=23617
gdbm is version 1.8.0
libpng is version 1.2.4
zlib is version 1.1.4
libxml version 2.4.12
freetype version 2.1.4
libart 2.2.3 *
*) libart has now become a part of the GNOME sources, and the latest
release is 2.2.12, never mind this, I think we should just stick to
2.2.3. OK?
(I think I will start providing readline support to the gnubg-no-gui
version. I'm not sure where I'll take the library from.)
That's all! Can we agree to use the above listed program in our builds?
Any other comments are welcome?
There's also an other possibillity. We could use the GTK runtime libraries
from the GIMP for Windows package. It will same the poeple who uses both
the gimp and gnubg the trouble of having the same gtk libraries to places
on their computer.
I'm checking out this possibility now. I would also like to discuss the
the installation archive. It would be nice if we could join forces with
the GIMP for Windows project, and thereby use the same GTK installation
as they use. I'll check if it's possible and make a suggestion for this
later today if I can. (The days goes fast....)
-Øystein