RE: [Bug-gnubg] Feature Request: Differential reporting of rolloutresult
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Feature Request: Differential reporting of rolloutresults
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:31:54 +0200
"Ian Shaw" <address@hidden>
wrote on 29/06/2009 16:19:29:
> Indeed. The plethora of dice alternatives does not help win the
> argument. Such people are unlikely to be convinced by anything, so
> wouldn't cater to their folly. I agree that manual dice should remain.
> see no need for random.org, myself, but am open to persuasion.
random.org would be my first arguemnt against somebody
accusing gnubg's RNG to be not fair (I mean somebody not convinced
by the argument "Look at the source code"). Manual dice is second,
and last. Above that I just resign and let them swim in their nonsense.