[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:11:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> any reason for not adding a note when
> warning about obsolete stuff ? rather than updating every module that is
> marked obsolete, the gnulib tool itself could include the pointer.
Hmm. Neither of these two options looks really good: A larger notice in every
modules file is hard to maintain. And letting gnulib-tool show extra text
would mix up the semantics of the 'Status' and of the 'Notice' field.
Bruno
- mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/04
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/17
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/18
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/24
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/27
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/27
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/28
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/28