[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tue, 17 May 2011 00:32:53 +0200
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> What seems to be missing here is a clarification of what it means for a
> platform to be "modern" -- I recall we discussed this before, but I
> cannot find that anything ended up in the manual.
> I think we need to name some platforms that we consider "modern" and
> some platforms that we consider obsolete for the "obsolete" keyword to
> be well defined and understandable by maintainers.
I've now reworked my proposal from January and committed a doc section
It gives no definite answer, because there are various degrees of support.
But at some point there's a consensus that platform XY is obsolete.
In memoriam The victims of the Zaklopača massacre