[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: musl compatibility
From: |
Reuben Thomas |
Subject: |
Re: musl compatibility |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:28:16 +0100 |
On 8 June 2012 11:19, Pedro Alves <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've heard such rants as well. The rants are IMO, misdirected. For instance,
> IIRC, gnulib's freadahead use is caused by musl's printf not being posix
> compliant, causing gnulib to pull in its printf replacement, which doesn't
> work
> on musl. A library that is new, actively maintained, and that calls itself
> a "C/POSIX standard library" should really address that by making it's printf
> posix compliant, so that gnulib's fallback doesn't even get built. It seems
> that
> nobody who is interested in musl has looked at gnulib's config.log to
> understand
> why does gnulib think musl's printf is not good enough.
Thanks; I'll report that to the musl development list.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
- musl compatibility, Reuben Thomas, 2012/06/07
- Re: musl compatibility, Pedro Alves, 2012/06/08
- Re: musl compatibility,
Reuben Thomas <=
- Re: musl compatibility, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/06/12
- Re: musl compatibility, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/12
- Re: musl compatibility, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: musl compatibility, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/06/23
- Re: musl compatibility, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/23