[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318 |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:44:45 +0200 |
> He also run gnulib's test suite, with results attached below (taken from
> https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-bison/2021-09/msg00031.html).
Well, when I build the same tarball on Cygwin 2.9.0 64-bit, I get much better
results (10 failures, not 43 failures).
Bruno
test-suite.log
Description: Text Data
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/16
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/16
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Bruno Haible, 2021/09/16
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/17
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Bruno Haible, 2021/09/17
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/18
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/18
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/18
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Bruno Haible, 2021/09/18
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/18
- Re: bison segv under Cygwin 64 at fatal-signal.c:318, Brian Inglis, 2021/09/18