[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock hit 3rd place on AMO

From: David Hedlund
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock hit 3rd place on AMO
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:40:18 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0

On 2016-12-21 18:34, Sedov Andrey wrote:
I'm not arguing that a high rating is more donations. More donations is the best development software. But the betrayal of the idea Adblock = this betrayal.
I said that uBlock Origin refuse to take donations. The author, Raymond Hill, is against it, thus nobody can sue him as they tried with the Adblock Plus company Eyeo.

I think that GNU's fair. Adblock is not fair. I think people are coasting (old information) make a choice Adblock.
But over time more people will use uBlock Origin and less use of Adblock. And ratings for AMO Adblock will decrease uBlock Origin will improve (heh... I know I'm naive and idealist:) )
So I think that the way IceCat SpyBlock is the way with uBlock Origin, but not the path with the traitor Adblock.

If you have a Savannah account, then please put your vote on http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49606 (click on "Votes" at the bottom of the page).

21.12.2016 23:55, David Hedlund пишет:
The AMO popularity rank is a key factor in making a good decision. uBlock Origin refuse to take donations so this cannot be profitable for the devs.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]