[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock hit 3rd place on AMO

From: awakeyet
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock hit 3rd place on AMO
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 18:14:22 +0100 (CET)

I really like spyblock. it just works and I don't have to worry about ublock that's constantly being aggressively shilled everywhere like linux mint. please let me just keep my spyblock.

Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!

21. Dec 2016 12:40 by address@hidden:

On 2016-12-21 18:34, Sedov Andrey wrote:
I'm not arguing that a high rating is more donations. More donations is the best development software. But the betrayal of the idea Adblock = this betrayal.
I said that uBlock Origin refuse to take donations. The author, Raymond Hill, is against it, thus nobody can sue him as they tried with the Adblock Plus company Eyeo.

I think that GNU's fair. Adblock is not fair. I think people are coasting (old information) make a choice Adblock.
But over time more people will use uBlock Origin and less use of Adblock. And ratings for AMO Adblock will decrease uBlock Origin will improve (heh... I know I'm naive and idealist:) )
So I think that the way IceCat SpyBlock is the way with uBlock Origin, but not the path with the traitor Adblock.

If you have a Savannah account, then please put your vote on http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49606 (click on "Votes" at the bottom of the page).

21.12.2016 23:55, David Hedlund пишет:
The AMO popularity rank is a key factor in making a good decision. uBlock Origin refuse to take donations so this cannot be profitable for the devs.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]