|
From: | Julian Foad |
Subject: | Re: [bug-grep] doc bug in grep; PATTERN implies a regexp used in --include or --exclude |
Date: | Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:24:46 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041122 |
Tony Abou-Assaleh wrote:
"defaults to `01;31' which means" should become: "defaults to `01;31', which means" I think 'which' should always be preceded by a comma.
,Which grammar book said that? :-) In, which grammar book did you read that? :-)(I'm just pointing out that that idea is an over-generalisation: it needs further qualification of which circumsances it applies to.)
I disagree, unless you also insert a comma or stronger separator before "and defaults to". Otherwise "which" seems to refer not just to the "01;31" but to the whole of the first half of the sentence (the fact that the colour is defined by an environment variable as well as having a default value), which is wrong. (In that last sentence of mine, "which" does refer to the whole preceeding part of the sentence (except the initial "otherwise"), and not just to the preceeding noun phrase.)
But this is really nit-picking. The meaning is clear either way, and there are more important things to worry about.
- Julian
+on the terminal. The color is defined by the environment variable address@hidden and defaults to `01;31', which means the text is red.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |