[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1? |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:02:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Gregory Marton <address@hidden> writes:
>> As I suggested earlier [0], I think it's just a matter of
>> non-determinism: there's no guarantee as to when system asyncs are run.
>
> And as I suggested earlier, I think it is very valuable to have
> guarantees about when alarms in particular are handled -- that being
> what they're for.
Yes, I understand the rationale---and sorry if my message sounded harsh!
At a minimum, we could provide a Scheme primitive to allow users to
explicitly ask system asyncs to run (and that's just a few lines of C to
add). What do you think?
Ludo'.
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, (continued)
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/07/07
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Neil Jerram, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/07/18
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/18
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: with-timeout and asynchronous alarm (was: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?), Gregory Marton, 2008/07/18