[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13905: (max inexact exact) => always inexact?
From: |
Daniel Llorens |
Subject: |
bug#13905: (max inexact exact) => always inexact? |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:19:10 +0100 |
On Mar 8, 2013, at 19:59, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> By the way, there's an easy way to accomplish what you want. Simply use
> 'reduce' (from SRFI-1) instead of 'fold':
>
> (reduce max -inf.0 exact-number-list)
I was about to roll my own, but this is exactly the case where fold doesn't
work and reduce does.
Thank you,
Daniel