[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: page fault in mach_msg_trap

From: Jeff Bailey
Subject: Re: page fault in mach_msg_trap
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 08:15:54 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:28:32PM +0000, Adam Olsen wrote:

> My thinking was that a hltonpanic=1 kernel argument would be good.
> The advantage over a configure option is that it doesn't require a
> recompile to use.

If we're coping with a kernel panic, can we count on a kernel
parameter still being in tact?

This is where I prove that I don't know much about systems
programming.  Feel free to ignore me. =)

Jeff Bailey

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]