[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation)

From: Thomas Bushnell BSG
Subject: Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation)
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:47:30 -0700

On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 18:49 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> I did cite one such case already, from cons.c (it appears in quite a  
> few other files as well), and Thomas cited one as well.
> (3) all advertising
> * materials mentioning features or use of this software display the  
> following
> * acknowledgement: ``This product includes software developed by the
> * Computer Systems Laboratory at the University of Utah.''

I didn't see that in your post.  As Roland said, we have friends at
Utah, and there is every reason to think they will simply give us
permission to remove the naxious advertising clause.  Let's proceed on
the assumption that this is true for now.

Roland, can you talk to Jay or whoever is appropriate?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]