[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation)
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation) |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:47:30 -0700 |
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 18:49 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> I did cite one such case already, from cons.c (it appears in quite a
> few other files as well), and Thomas cited one as well.
>
> (3) all advertising
> * materials mentioning features or use of this software display the
> following
> * acknowledgement: ``This product includes software developed by the
> * Computer Systems Laboratory at the University of Utah.''
I didn't see that in your post. As Roland said, we have friends at
Utah, and there is every reason to think they will simply give us
permission to remove the naxious advertising clause. Let's proceed on
the assumption that this is true for now.
Roland, can you talk to Jay or whoever is appropriate?
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/06/16