[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Change unionfs argument handling policy

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Change unionfs argument handling policy
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:32:10 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)


On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:52:50PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:08 PM, <olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net> wrote:

> > But now that you mention it, I see that indeed it might be an
> > interesting option to let settrans do all the setup, and have the
> > translator component only serve as a helper...
> Do you mean that ``settrans --unionmount'' should use unionfs to
> actually do the union mount?

Perhaps. The ideas are all very vague still.

> If so, what shall the mountee sit on?

Obviously, we need some helper that handles the internal node.

> If not so, I fail to see any special advantage of this syntax compared
> to ``settrans <node> unionmount <translator>''.

The obvious advantage is that it is simpler and more intuitive for the

Not sure about the technical merits yet...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]