[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Source repositories, unionmount code

From: Arne Babenhauserheide
Subject: Re: Source repositories, unionmount code
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:59:06 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-hh2; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; )


Am Montag, 28. September 2009 10:16:15 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
> > > Note that as opposed to some other translators (like Zheng's
> > > eth-multiplexer), both unionfs and nsmux were designed to be
> > > stand-alone,
> >
> > ...which is the reason why I still haven't tested nsmux -- I'm still
> > waiting for you to integrate it in the Hurd tree
> That doesn't make any sense.  If you're interested: just get the source
> code and run make.  Why does it need to be part of the Hurd code
> conglomerate in order for you being able to test it?  And yes: they
> should remain stand-alone.  I will integrate these packages into our git
> repositories soonish.

Maybe it would help testing to have a README in the new LiveCD which says, 
which commandline commands to use to test the translators (down to simple copy 
paste) - including a list of interesting translators. 

> > And the last question is about the integration itself: how exactly do
> > I take my nsmux git repository and integrate it into the Hurd git
> > repository?
> You don't; I'll do.  But not into the main Hurd repository.

Does that mean it'll simply get into one of the subrepositories? 

Best wishes, 

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 
Unpolitisch sein
hei├čt politisch sein, 
ohne es zu merken. 
- Arne (http://draketo.de)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]