|
From: | Samuel Thibault |
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp] |
Date: | Thu, 3 Mar 2011 03:41:09 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Hello, Svante Signell, le Wed 02 Mar 2011 09:17:09 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > I forgot to comment on the udeb version: I don't think we want to create > > an inetutils-tools udeb package, while we can simply issue settrans > > which should be easy and fine enough, since we only handle one > > interface, thus my changes. > > Ok, I'm attaching the patch, fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch, Great, it basically just works! I've uploaded a built package to debian-ports. I've reworked patches a bit to make them more acceptable to upstream, and here is how you should now submit the bug report, see attached files: - "patch" is a patch against the debian/ directory, so the maintainer can simply apply it directly. - "fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch", containing only upstream changes, thus to be added to debian/patches by the maintainer. - the dhclient-script.hurd* files, to be added by the maintainer, filed separately to make them more readable for review. > I think my name should be removed from the patched scripts, you did > most of the changes. Nope. You did the long boring tedious work to get things working again. You deserve the credit, even if I ended up rewriting things. Samuel
patch
Description: Text document
fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch
Description: Text document
dhclient-script.hurd
Description: Text document
dhclient-script.hurd.udeb
Description: Text document
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |