[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Possible bug

From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: Possible bug
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:02:48 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913

It should definitely not be part of the LilyPond package.
One possibility is to use Werner's fix and include that in


Bertalan Fodor wrote:
So, what will happen? I'd like to package 2.4.2 for cygwin... Should I put ec.mf into the lilypond package? Or should it be in the tetex-tiny package?

You lost me here.  I thought you found that ecrm1000 should not be
looked for at all?

I tried Bertalan's example file here and the dvips command with
$KPATHSEA_DEBUG set to -1, it does not search for ecrm1000,

I'd gladly fix the Cygwin tetex installation, but I want to be sure to
make the right fix and not add another bug.

Bertalan, what does Mats's command give you?  Can you send a
(comressed) log file to the list?


bug-lilypond mailing list

        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]