[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Barline scans
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Barline scans |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:44:52 +0100 (CET) |
> If we want to mimick Baerenreiter, my quick scan suggests we should
> tune it up from 1.9 to 2.2, but we'd have to compare good printouts
> with the original.
Uh, oh, you are exaggerating. What you describe is definitely not the
usual case for Bärenreiter. More than the current factor is
*definitely* too much. It deviates too much from most other
Bärenreiter editions I know.
Werner
- Re: Barline scans, (continued)
- Re: Barline scans, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/10
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/10
- Re: Barline scans, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/10
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/10
- Re: Barline scans, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/10
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/10
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/10
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/09
- Re: Barline scans, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2007/01/10