[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordG

From: Colin Campbell
Subject: Re: emproving Documentation about chordGlissando [WAS:consecutive chordGlissando]
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:41:11 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8

On 11-04-25 11:33 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:

On 4/25/11 11:26 AM, "Federico Bruni"<address@hidden>  wrote:

Il giorno lun, 25/04/2011 alle 00.09 +0200, Federico Bruni ha scritto:
Or should I rather edit
I've changed my mind and I think that I should edit this file instead of

In the meanwhile I've realized that relative mode triggers another error
when chordGlissando moves down (from higher to lower pitches).  Pitches
are correct, but glissandi are in a mess.
See chord-glissando-down.ly attached.

There's a workaround for this error?
I think that documentation should cover this issue as well (if there's
not a workaround, we might say that a chordGlissando "moving back"
should be entered in absolute mode?).
It looks to me like the proper documentation is a warning that says
"chordGlissando is unreliable in relative mode.  It is recommended to be
always used in absolute mode."

A bug report should be posted.

We don't normally list bugs as warnings, so maybe once we list the bug we
can't have the warning.

It appears to me right now that chordGlissando is a sufficiently rough hack
that it should probably be removed from the distribution and just be present
in the LSR.



Should this be a new issue, Carl, or should I just add this message to issue 1617?

Colin Campbell

The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance
of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who
have too little.
-Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32nd US President (1882-1945)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]