|
From: | lilypond |
Subject: | Re: Issue 1110 in lilypond: Wrong octave of repetition chord with \relative and #{ #} syntax |
Date: | Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:29:32 +0000 |
Comment #14 on issue 1110 by address@hidden: Wrong octave of repetition chord with \relative and #{ #} syntax
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1110Maybe I'm naïve, but shouldn't q be processed much earlier? What we really want IMHO is a shorthand at the input level to spare a lot of typing; thus
<a c e'> q should be equal to typing <a c e'> <a c e'> ,and as soon as a new <...> is seen, this new chord used as the subsitution for q.
Consequently I wonder whether handling of q can't be done by the lexer (or parser? I always mix this up :-). Maybe such an implementation would be really dumb, but I think that too much cleverness with \relative causes more headaches than necessary...
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |