[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 1356 in lilypond: LilyPond-style comments embeddedinaScheme ex

From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: Issue 1356 in lilypond: LilyPond-style comments embeddedinaScheme expression can't include special characters
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:23:41 -0000

"Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 02:28:45PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
"Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote in message
>I honestly believe that less than 50% of bug squad volunteers are
>actively working after 4 weeks.  Am I incorrect as a matter of

I don't know the history.  I believe the current squad, as shown on
the CG, has 100% active members.

Don't believe, *demonstrate*.  It's Christmas time -- we can
find out who's been naughty and nice.

Not that I suggest it's time to freak out if some new helpers are
less active than others; it's only been a week or two, so they can
legitimately still be reading the CG.  But I really want to
encourage you and Carl to run those scripts; there should be no
guesswork / estimation / belief about this.  You should check the
records once a week or two, and actively ask volunteers if they
need clarification if they fall behind.

I don't generally run this, since, as you know, my main working environment is Windows and Outlook Express (!). However, I made my statement based on other aspects of being "active" - emails to me concerning the rota, questions about the CG, verifying issues - none of which the script checks, IIRC. On that basis, all bug squad members are currently active.

Phil Holmes
Bug Squad

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]