[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Review of chapter 4 of NR (spacing.itely)

From: Federico Bruni
Subject: Re: Review of chapter 4 of NR (spacing.itely)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:23:39 +0100

Il giorno mar 22 dic 2015 alle 11:00, Federico Bruni <address@hidden> ha scritto:
g) 4.5.5 Proportional notation
"The spacing is bad because the evenly spaced notes of the bottom staff do not stretch uniformly. Classical engravings include very few complex triplets and so classical engraving rules can generate this type of result."

The second sentence is not very clear to me.
Which type of result?
Shouldn't say tuplets instead of triplets?

IIUC the problem arises with longer tuplets, as in the 5-tuplet of the example. As classical engravings include very few complex (and long) tuplets, this kind of problem is not taken into account by classical engraving rules.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]