[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: accidentals on merged notes

From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: accidentals on merged notes
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:24:01 +0200

2017-08-15 18:54 GMT+02:00 Knut Petersen <address@hidden>:
> Hi Phil!
>>> regards,
>>> Hauke Rehr (from Germany)
>> Looks the same as https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1134/ ?
> Yes, it is the same old bug/defect/limitation. Although the problem is
> documented in the notation manual I think it actually is a serious defect.
> The code that automatically adds accidentals does not support different
> accidentals for the same pitch at the same time. "Merged" notes are not the
> cause of the problem (btw: lilypond never merges noteheads, it prints
> multiple noteheads at the same position).
> Have a look at this link <https://musescore.org/en/node/14449> and that link
> <https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/24030/what-does-this-split-stem-notation-mean>
> to see some related examples of music written by Chopin, Ravel and Scriabin
> ...
> Knut

Another extreme example:
Ornstein, Wild mans dance

Perhaps my old coding here (after an idea by Mike Solomon)
may be found helpful.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]