|Subject:||Re: Compacting link-rules|
|Date:||Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:00:24 +0300|
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 09:26 +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> I have a similar issue, but in my case I used explicit pattern rules,
> vpath and added compiler generated .d files to make sure the object
> files are regenerated on .h modification, but the end result was that
> the pattern rules were no longer called after the initial generation.
> My tentative explanation is that the .d dependency rules are
> considered more specific (but empty) than the pattern rules and/or
> vpath is at fault, also.
> Is this explanation correct? Will the issue also appear in the
> solution above?
I'm sorry but I don't understand your description. If you would like
some help please post a minimal, complete example (and create a new
mailing list thread for it). Cheers!
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|