[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: python (parted) question

From: Paul Telford
Subject: Re: python (parted) question
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:02:29 -0700 (PDT)

On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Andrew Clausen wrote:

> I never received your email.

Ah sorry, I only posted to the debian list the first time around.  Added a
CC to the parted list this time as I thought it might be a better place to

> 1.6 is not compatible with 1.4.  Where did you get python-parted for
> libparted 1.6?

Debian unstable provides v0.11 of python-parted which claims to be 1.6 

> The names of the PedDisk constructor changed, to reflect changes in the
> semantics.

So what does that mean to me in practical terms?  I'm not entirely sure 
what a "constructor" is.


Paul Telford | 1024D/431B38BA | address@hidden | address@hidden
       C903 0E85 9AF5 1B80 6A5F  F169 D7E9 4363 431B 38BA

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]