[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-patch] lin should be ssize_t, not off_t

From: Tobias Stoeckmann
Subject: Re: [bug-patch] lin should be ssize_t, not off_t
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 17:04:32 +0100

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 04:16:07PM +0100, Andreas Gr├╝nbacher wrote:
> > Without such a switch, way too large lins are parsed without errors,
> > exceeding limits in various parts of the source.
> Shouldn't we instead fix the code where it is currently broken?

I just see than plan b can support an off_t amount of lines... I have
to reevaluate this, probably my concern is void.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]