Re: [Chicken-janitors] Re: Compiling 2.736 w/ 2.736

[Elf]

more thoughts on this: perhaps recursive inline calls could be caught and 
the top-level inline be replaced by a named-let form?

-elf


On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Elf wrote:

> one would think that it shouldnt error, that it should just not continue to
> inline it ...
>
> -elf
>
>
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:
>
> > On Nov 15, 2007 5:43 PM, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Hi Felix,
> > >
> > > /usr/local/bin/chicken compiler.scm -quiet -no-trace -optimize-level
> > > 2 -include-path . -no-lambda-info -extend private-namespace.scm -
> > > output-file compiler.c
> > > Error: recursive invocation of inline function `make-node',
> > > invocation chain: (make-node)
> >
> > Crap. I see know that my solution can not work.
> >
> >
> > cheers,
> > felix
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-janitors mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-janitors