Re: [Chicken-janitors] Re: [Chicken-bugs] #356: inline recursion

[felix winkelmann]

On Nov 20, 2007 4:02 AM, Elf <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> i think it can be solved fairly trivially: add a pass to go over the inlined
> procedures, keeping a stack of inlined names.  drop elements off the stack 
> once
> the top-level ex-continuation returns.  check any new names against the stack.
> if a name is encountered again, add a named let wrapper around the entire
> procedure which binds the same arguments, and call that looper instead.
> is there a reason this shouldnt work as expected?
>

That still won't terminate. What do you mean by "call the looper"? At
compile-time or at run-time? Can you give me an example? (Sorry,
I'm a bit thick in the moment).


cheers,
felix