|
From: | Kon Lovett |
Subject: | [Chicken-users] Re: SRFI-27 "inconsistency" |
Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:00:45 -0700 |
On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:09 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Terrence Brannon scripsit:I dont know why things like SRFI-27 get ratified and have the inconsistency that Kon discusses in the "Issues" section of his docs: http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/srfi-27.html
There is no "inconsistency" in the SRFI. The comment in the issues section is just that, a comment.
Best Wishes, Kon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |